This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Verges, M. Articles by Duffy, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Connected to Birds but Not Bees: Valence Moderates Implicit Associations With Nature

¹ Dept. of Psychology
² Rutgers University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mverges{at}iusb.edu.

	Abstract

The article discusses three experiments that replicated and extended prior research on implicit connections with built and natural environments. In Experiment 1, participants classify "nature" (e.g., trees) and "self" (e.g., me) items faster than "built" (e.g., factory) and "other" (e.g., them) items. This effect may attribute to words that elicit stronger positive associations to nature and stronger negative associations to built categories. In Experiment 2, participants rated nature and self items more positively than built and other items. This finding suggests a propensity to view oneself and the natural environment more favorably in comparison to others and the built environment. This positive association to nature, however, was reversed in Experiment 3: Participants classify built and self items faster than nature and self items. Results indicate that stimulus valence moderates implicit associations to built and natural environments. Implications regarding the role of affective processing on implicit attitudes to these environments are discussed.

First published on June 10, 2009
Environment and Behavior 2009, doi:10.1177/0013916508330210


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?