Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walden, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crowding, Privacy, and Coping

Tedra A. Walden

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Mailman Center for Child Development, University of Miami

Paul A. Nelson

Psychological Services Unit at the Veteran's Administration Medical Center

Dale E. Smith

School of Justice at the American University in Washington, D.C.

This study investigated the relationship between living in crowded dormitory conditions and values and expectancies of privacy in 51 entering college freshmen. Aggression, withdrawal, and attitudes toward the environment and toward roommates were assessed. Results indicated that crowded living conditions did affect students' values of privacy but not expectations for obtaining privacy. Locus of control did not mediate responses to high-density living conditions. Crowding was differentially responded to by males and females, with females apparently being less disturbed by the crowded conditions. Females tended to increase values of privacy and spent more time in the more dense rooms while males decreased their values of privacy and withdrew from the situation, spending considerably less time in the higher density dormitory rooms. It is suggested that males and females have different thresholds for feeling crowded and may employ different cognitive and behavioral coping mechanisms for adapting to crowded conditions.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 2, 205-224 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916581132005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
L. K. Block and G. S. Stokes
Performance and Satisfaction in Private versus Nonprivate Work Settings
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 1989; 21(3): 277 - 297.
[Abstract]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D. E. Schmidt, M. K. Conn, L. D. Greene, and K. E. Mesirow
Social Alienation and Social Support
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 1982; 8(3): 515 - 521.
[Abstract]