Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Heffernan, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Government Programs for Soil Conservation

Progressive or Regressive Effects?

Gary P. Green

Department of Sociology and the Institute of Community and Area Development, University of Georgia, Athens.

William D. Heffernan

University of Missouri-Columbia.

Farmers and landowners are increasingly looking to the federal government for financial support and a comprehensive policy that would encourage the reduction of soil loss on agricultural lands. One general problem has been developing a policy that is both effective and equitable. Of the options available, the most discussed proposal has been the cross-compliance program that bases other agricultural program benefits on the ability of the farmer to meet a specified soil conservation standard. This study concludes that such a policy would have a regressive impact on farmers, and probably consumers, and would in the long run be ineffective.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 18, No. 3, 369-384 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916586183004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?