This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heerwagen, J. H. Articles by Orians, G. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Adaptations to Windowlessness

A Study of the Use of Visual Decor in Windowed and Windowless Offices

University of Washington

Gordon H. Orians

University of Washington

This research examines the use of visual material to decorate windowed and windowless offices. Three hypotheses were tested: (1) Occupants of windowless offices should put up more visual materials than do occupants of windowed offices to compensate for the stimulus deprivation; (2) visual materials in windowless offices should consist of more "surrogate views" (e.g., landscapes and cityscapes) than the visual materials in windowed offices where real views are present; and (3) visual decor in windowless offices should be dominated by materials with a nature content. A detailed content analysis of wall decor used in 75 offices on the University of Washington campus was conducted. Results show that occupants of windowless space used twice as many (195 versus 82) visual materials to decorate their offices. Further, materials in windowless offices were dominated by nature themes as predicted in hypothesis 3. Although windowless occupants did not use significantly more "surrogate views" overall than did occupants of windowed spaces, content of the surrogate views was significantly different for the two windowed conditions. People in windowless offices used more landscapes and fewer cityscapes than did occupants of windowed spaces.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 18, No. 5, 623-639 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916586185003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Kaplan The Nature of the View from Home: Psychological Benefits Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2001; 33(4): 507 - 542. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Leather, M. Pyrgas, D. Beale, and C. Lawrence Windows in the Workplace: Sunlight, View, and Occupational Stress Environment and Behavior, November 1, 1998; 30(6): 739 - 762. [Abstract]

				N. J. Stone Windows and Environmental Cues on Performance and Mood Environment and Behavior, May 1, 1998; 30(3): 306 - 321. [Abstract]

				P. B. Newell A Cross-Cultural Examination of Favorite Places Environment and Behavior, July 1, 1997; 29(4): 495 - 514. [Abstract]

				M. Boubekri Appraisal of the Lighting Conditions in an Office Building: Results of a Survey Indoor and Built Environment, May 1, 1995; 4(3-4): 162 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. M. Biner, D. L. Butler, T. E. Lovegrove, and R. L. Burns Windowlessness in the Workplace: A Reexamination of the Compensation Hypothesis Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1993; 25(2): 205 - 227. [Abstract]