Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Everett, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stening, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Overseas Assignment Preferences of Japanese Managers

James E. Everett

Department of Management of the University of Western Australia.

Bruce W. Stening

Department of Management of the University of Western Australia.

The overseas assignment preferences of 76 Japanese managers being trained for overseas postings are analyzed, together with their assessments of ten potential destination cities on ten relevant evaluation criteria. A clear preference for Western postings is evident. Discriminant analysis based on the evaluation criteria is used to map the cities, and the discriminant map almost completely explains the mean preferences for the ten cities. The Japanese managers are found to be homogeneous in their preferences and assessments of overseas postings. The mean preferences for the cities are strongly related (over 98% explained variance) to the mean assessments on the evaluation criteria. In contrast, individual differences in preferences for the cities are only weakly related (7% explained variance) to individual differences in assessments on the evaluation criteria.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 2, 151-174 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916589212002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?