Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vining, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Environmental Emotions and Decisions

A Comparison of the Responses and Expectations of Forest Managers, an Environmental Group, and the Public

Joanne Vining

Institute for Environmental Studies and the Department of Psychologyat the University of Illinois

Independent samples of forest managers, members of an environmental group, and a regional public constituency were asked either to respond to a hypothetical forest management problem or to predict how a member of one of the other groups would respond. Decisions and emotions of the environmental group and public sample were similar to each other but both differed from those of the managers. Decisions were predicted accurately by all three groups, but managers and environmental group members perceived the public sample to be less emotional than it actually was. These results are interpreted in terms of a functional model of emotion and environmental decision making, and implications for public involvement programs are discussed.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 1, 3-34 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916592241001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
R. B. Habig, S. C. Grado, L. A. Grace, and L. M. Capella
Attitudes and Perceptions of Mississippi Loggers and Environmentalists Toward the Forest Industry
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, June 1, 2005; 25(3): 260 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
A. E. Stamps III
Demographic Effects in Environmental Aesthetics: A Meta-Analysis
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 1999; 14(2): 155 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
E. Kals, D. Schumacher, and L. Montada
Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature
Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1999; 31(2): 178 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
A. Stamps and S. Miller
Advocacy Membership, Design Guidelines, and Predicting Preferences for Residential Infill Designs
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 1993; 25(5): 367 - 409.
[Abstract]