|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Changing Behavior and Making it Stick
The Conceptualization and Management of Conservation Behavior
Raymond De Young
University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment
A sustainable planet is not possible without patterns of conserving behavior. The resource-costly life-styles that are characteristic of the current scene present a historic challenge. Never before have so many behaviors needed to change in so short a time. More challenging is that they must stay changed. For many reasons the techniques commonly used to promote conservation behavior are more reliable at modulating short-term behavior than at achieving durable change. The perceived urgency of environmental problems tends to make immediate behavior change the major focus. But of equal importance is the stability of behavior once changed. Thus one goal of conservation behavior research is to discover techniques that change individual behavior while minimizing or eliminating the need for repeated intervention. This article categerorizes behavior change techniques first by their informational or motivational nature and second by the source of the change: derived from others or gained by direct personal involvement. Evaluating selected techniques using five proposed dimensions suggests why durable behavior change has been so hard to achieve. Research implications are discussed.
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 3,
485-505 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916593253003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kurz, M. Linden, and N. Sheehy
Attitudinal and Community Influences on Participation in New Curbside Recycling Initiatives in Northern Ireland
Environment and Behavior,
May 1, 2007;
39(3):
367 - 391.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bratt
The Impact of Norms and Assumed Consequences on Recycling Behavior
Environment and Behavior,
September 1, 1999;
31(5):
630 - 656.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kals, D. Schumacher, and L. Montada
Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature
Environment and Behavior,
March 1, 1999;
31(2):
178 - 202.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Clayton
Preference for Macrojustice Versus Microjustice in Environmental Decisions
Environment and Behavior,
March 1, 1998;
30(2):
162 - 183.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. L. Margai
Analyzing Changes in Waste Reduction Behavior in a Low-Income Urban Community Following a Public Outreach Program
Environment and Behavior,
November 1, 1997;
29(6):
769 - 792.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. De Young
Some Psychological Aspects of Reduced Consumption Behavior: The Role of Intrinsic Satisfaction and Competence Motivation
Environment and Behavior,
May 1, 1996;
28(3):
358 - 409.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Oskamp, L. Zelezny, P. W. Schultz, S. Hurin, and R. Burkhardt
Commingled Versus Separated Curbside Recycling: Does Sorting Matter?
Environment and Behavior,
January 1, 1996;
28(1):
73 - 91.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Reams, J. P. Geaghan, and R. C. Gendron
The Link between Recycling and Litter: A Field Study
Environment and Behavior,
January 1, 1996;
28(1):
92 - 110.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Karp
Values and their Effect on Pro-Environmental Behavior
Environment and Behavior,
January 1, 1996;
28(1):
111 - 133.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|