Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cary, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Nature of Symbolic Beliefs and Environmental Behavior in a Rural Setting

John Cary

School of Agriculture and Forestry at the University of Melbourne, ParkWile, Australia

The correspondence between positively held beliefs about the environment and consistent environmental behavior is often tenuous. Many environmental beliefs have the characteristics of symbolic beliefs. Symbolic beliefs, reflecting what the belief objects represent for individual identity and values, provide social identification or self-expressive value functions for individuals. Symbolic beliefs are more abstract than instrumental beliefs and are less rooted in reality. In a research study of beliefs about environmental behavior related to rural land management, symbolic beliefs and instrumental beliefs were identified. Symbolic environmental beliefs were reflected in property holders claiming environmental benefits for behaviors primarily determined by more tangible, instrumental purposes. Decreasing proximity to the location of an environmental problem increased the instability of perceptions of the problem. It is likely that the more remote the belief object, the more symbolic the belief.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 4, 555-576 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916593254001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
F. J. Obregon-Saudo and V. Corral-Verdugo
Systems of Beliefs and Environmental Conservation Behavior in a Mexican Community
Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1997; 29(2): 213 - 235.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
P. O. Hallin
Environmental Concern and Environmental Behavior in Foley, a Small Town in Minnesota
Environment and Behavior, July 1, 1995; 27(4): 558 - 578.
[Abstract]