Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Map Alignment in Traveling Multisegment Routes

David H. Warren

Department of Psychology at the University of California, Riverside

Teres E. Scott

Department of Psychology at the University of California, Riverside

Two hypotheses were based on previous research with simple path maps and you-are-here maps. First, when given a choice, observers prefer to align a map with the environment that it represents; second, performance on way finding tasks is better when the map is aligned than when it is not aligned with the environment. This latter phenomenon is called the map alignment effect. Both hypotheses were strongly supported in two experiments conducted in a relatively structured environment using four-segment paths. A third experiment was conducted in a larger, wooded, hilly environment. The observers carried the map and consulted it at will while finding a route from a starting point to a goal. In this setting, both hypotheses again found support. Observers did not consult the map at every turn, but when they did, they turned the map into map/environment alignment on two thirds of the instances. Errors occurred with greater frequency when the map was not aligned with the environment. The generality of the map alignment effect was thus demonstrated for larger and more complex environments than have previously been studied and with more naturalistic map-use procedures than have been used. Finally, there was clear evidence that observers acquired incidental knowledge about the spatial structure of the environment while using a map to negotiate the environment, despite the fact that there was no explicit requirement to learn. Questions remain about the nature of the learning and retention of information so acquired.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 4, 643-666 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916593254006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
K. A. Kastens> and T. Ishikawa
Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 413(0): 53 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
M. Tlauka and P. N. Wilson
Orientation-Free Representations from Navigation through a Computer-Simulated Environment
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 1996; 28(5): 647 - 664.
[Abstract]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
D. H. Warren
Self-Localization on Plan and Oblique Maps
Environment and Behavior, January 1, 1994; 26(1): 71 - 98.
[Abstract]