Environment and Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonaiuto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnes, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 6, 699-747 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/001391659602800601

Multiplace Analysis of the Urban Environment

A Comparison Between a Large and a Small Italian City

Marino Bonaiuto

University of Rome "La Sapienza."

Mirilia Bonnes

University of Rome ULa Sapienza."

Inhabitants' relationships with their urban environment in a large (Rome) versus a small (Lecce) Italian city are compared by a multiplace analysis. The inhabitanV city relationship is studied first at the intraplace and then at the interplace level of analysis with reference to three urban places: the neighborhood, the center, and the periphery. According to the place-theory, which assumes activity to be one of the main constitutive components of place, activities performed by two samples of 434 inhabitants (Rome) and 120 inhabitants (Lecce) were taken into consideration. Each resident was asked to complete a structured questionnaire and to state how often he or she performed each of the listed activities in the three main places considered. Both the intraplace and the interplace analysis have pointed out some general and some other specific features that equalize or differentiate the inhabitant/city relationship according to city size. They refer to the way the city tends to be built up as a multiplace system in the residents' experience through their systems of activity, and as a function of their sociodemographic charactenstics such as age and sex. On the whole, small city inhabitants tend to have: (a) more integrated urban experences between different places and between home and neighborhood; (b) higher relevance of interpersonal socialization activities, especially in the neighborhood; and (c) urban activities and conditions characterized by less urban isolation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
M. Bonaiuto, M. Bonnes, and M. Continisio
Neighborhood Evaluation within a Multiplace Perspective on Urban Activities
Environment and Behavior, January 1, 2004; 36(1): 41 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]