Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGee, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Private Responses and Individual Action

Community Responses to Chronic Environmental Lead Contamination

Tara K. McGee

School of Ecology and Environment at Deakin University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

In 1992, chronic environmental lead contamination became an issue in the mining community of Broken Hill, New South Wales, Australia. This article is based on a study completed between 1992 and 1996, which explored the nature of community responses, including coping responses, effects on health and well-being, and factors mediating the community response process. Community responses were characterized by private rather than public responses, and individual rather than collective actions. Stigma, relationships between mining companies and the community, and social undermining helped to shape the private nature of responses. The individual nature of responses was found to be significantly affected by cognitive responses, including perceived relevance, acceptance, social beliefs about the lead contamination, and attribution of responsibility; cultural factors; and interventions. The results indicate that to assist communities faced with such hazards, intervention programs must move beyond an individual focus and address social responses as well as the contamination itself.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 1, 66-83 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
F. Vandermoere
The Process of Soil Excavation in a Community: Site-Specific Determinants of Stress Perception
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2006; 38(5): 715 - 739.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
E. Matthies, R. Hoger, and R. Guski
Living on Polluted Soil: Determinants of Stress Symptoms
Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2000; 32(2): 270 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]