Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lüdemann, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Subjective Expected Utility, Thresholds, and Recycling

Christian Lüdemann

University of Bremen

Threshold models belonging to the rational choice paradigm are developed for situations in which actors have two behavior alternatives; the costs and/or benefits of each alternative are dependent on the number of other actors choosing each alternative. Despite the analytical power of such collective action models, attempts to empirically measure individual thresholds have been rare. In this article, a measurement procedure is proposed and applied in a survey on environmental behavior (N = 247) in which costs, utilities, and expectations of outcomes of two behavior alternatives (putting waste glass into public recycling bins vs. putting glass into garbage cans) and personal thresholds for recycling waste glass are measured. First, subjective expected utility (SEU) theory is empirically tested. Second, a multivariate model explaining disposal behavior is examined. Third, hypotheses about predictors of individual thresholds are tested. Finally, problems associated with the use and measurement of thresholds are discussed.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 5, 613-629 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972263


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
C. M. Collins and S. M. Chambers
Psychological and Situational Influences on Commuter-Transport-Mode Choice
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2005; 37(5): 640 - 661.
[Abstract] [PDF]