Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Geller, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Community-Wide Intervention to Improve Pedestrian Safety

Guidelines for Institutionalizing Large-Scale Behavior Change

Thomas E. Boyce

Center for Behavioral Research Safety at the University of Nevada, Reno, teboyce{at}unr.edu

E. Scott Geller

Center for Applied Behavior Systems at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

An A-B-A reversal design with a long-term follow-up evaluated a community-wide commitment and incentive program to improve pedestrian safety. The campaign encouraged residents of a college community to sign promise cards to use crosswalks when crossing campus roads and to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks when driving. Crosswalk use increased during a 6-week intervention period to 68% (n = 1,718) from a baseline mean of 58% (n = 2,038). Driver-yielding behavior significantly increased throughout the study, from a baseline mean of 23% (n = 979) to a mean of 44% (n = 272) for 2 weeks after the removal of intervention materials and termination of publicity. Observations of crosswalk use and yielding behavior 1 year after the intervention revealed that crosswalk use returned to near baseline levels (61%, n = 1,954), but driver-yielding behavior (53%, n = 602) remained high, substantially above the baseline. Recommendations for institutionalizing pedestrian safety campaigns are offered.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 32, No. 4, 502-520 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00139160021972630


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
R. Tobias, A. Brugger, and H.-J. Mosler
Developing Strategies for Waste Reduction by Means of Tailored Interventions in Santiago de Cuba
Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2009; 41(6): 836 - 865.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
J Warsh, L Rothman, M Slater, C Steverango, and A Howard
Are school zones effective? An examination of motor vehicle versus child pedestrian crashes near schools
Inj. Prev., August 1, 2009; 15(4): 226 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
J. A. Miller, J. Austin, and D. Rohn
Teaching Pedestrian Safety Skills to Children
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2004; 36(3): 368 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]