This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Maass, A. Articles by Masserini, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Intimidating Buildings

Can Courthouse Architecture Affect Perceived Likelihood of Conviction?

Padua University

Ilaria Merici

Padua University

Erica Villafranca

Padua University

Rosaria Furlani

Padua University

Elena Gaburro

Padua University

Anna Getrevi

Padua University

Margherita Masserini

Padua University

This study tested the hypothesis that courthouse architecture may affect the feelings of hypothetical users as well as their estimates of likelihood of conviction. Participants (N = 120) from Northern Italy were asked to imagine a hypothetical trial to which they accompanied a wrongly accused friend; the trial either took place in a medieval or in a modern "high-style" courthouse. Compared to the old courthouse, the modern courthouse elicited significantly greater discomfort in participants already familiar with the respective building. Regardless of familiarity, participants estimated a greater likelihood that the friend would be convicted when the trial took place in the new building. Although the two courthouses were judged equally attractive on general dimensions of aesthetics, the new one was judged as more intimidating. Links between architectural features and social-cognitive processes are discussed.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 32, No. 5, 674-683 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00139160021972739


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?