Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zacharias, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Microclimate and Downtown Open Space Activity

John Zacharias

Concordia University

Ted Stathopoulos

Centre for Building Studies at Concordia University

Hanqing Wu

RWDI, Inc.

Microclimatic conditions in business district open spaces tend to be more extreme than prevailing weather conditions. Although the buildings are chiefly responsible for this inclemency, their shapes and arrangement could also potentially be used to moderate or enhance prevailing conditions. To provide better guidance in design, we need to know how humans respond to microclimatic conditions. In particular, we need to know first how sunlight, temperature, humidity, and wind combine in sensations of outdoor human comfort, and second, how important microclimatic factors are in behavior. This article reports on a study of revealed preferences for certain local climatic conditions, measured in terms of presence levels and activities in seven closely spaced corporate plazas and public squares in a built-up, downtown area. The observations were conducted over a 5-month period. The measured microclimatic conditions accounted for most of the variance in activity levels and types. Temperature was the single most important variable. Although great variation in level of use among spaces cannot be explained solely in terms of microclimatic differences, use within spaces varies chiefly as a function of microclimate.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 2, 296-315 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916501332008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
V. Mehta
Lively Streets: Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2007; 27(2): 165 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
S. Thorsson, T. Honjo, F. Lindberg, I. Eliasson, and E.-M. Lim
Thermal Comfort and Outdoor Activity in Japanese Urban Public Places
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2007; 39(5): 660 - 684.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
J. Zacharias, T. Stathopoulos, and H. Wu
Spatial Behavior in San Francisco's Plazas: The Effects of Microclimate, Other People, and Environmental Design
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2004; 36(5): 638 - 658.
[Abstract] [PDF]