Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, K. J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cary, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Landscape Preferences, Ecological Quality, and Biodiversity Protection

Kathryn J. H. Williams

Institute of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne

John Cary

Social Science Centre, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australia

The loss of biological diversity is a major environmental problem occurring on a global scale. Human-environment researchers have an important role in shaping policy and programs at a local, national, and international level. This article explores human preference for landscapes relative to ecological quality and assesses the relationship between these preferences and land management behavior. A survey of more than 1,000 urban and rural residents of southeastern Australia examined preferences for 36 black and white photographs of native vegetation. There was more commonality than difference between urban and rural preference for different arrays of native vegetation. Preference for Eucalyptus species was higher than preference for non-Eucalyptus species. Preference ratings indicate minimal differences across landscapes with distinct variation in ecological quality. The study suggests that preference forlandscapes of relatively high ecological quality is associated with behaviorthat is protective of this resource.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 2, 257-274 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916502034002006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. Adams, T. Cox, G. Moore, B. Croxford, M. Refaee, and S. Sharples
Sustainable Soundscapes: Noise Policy and the Urban Experience
Urban Stud, December 1, 2006; 43(13): 2385 - 2398.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
G. Carrus, M. Bonaiuto, and M. Bonnes
Environmental Concern, Regional Identity, and Support for Protected Areas in Italy
Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2005; 37(2): 237 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]