|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Value Structures behind Proenvironmental Behavior
Annika M. Nordlund
Jörgen Garvill
Transportation Research Unit at Umeå University
The purpose of the study was to test a hierarchical model of the effects of general values, environmental values, problem awareness, and personal norms on general proenvironmental behavior. The model starts with the effects of the relatively stable structures of general values and moves toward effects of more specific environmental values, environmental problem awareness, and personal norms. A personal norm was expected to mediate the effects of values and problem awareness on proenvironmental behavior. Survey data from a Swedish sample of 1,400 individuals were used in a path analysis to test the model, which was supported, and the results showed that the personal norm could be seen as derived from self-transcendent and ecocentric values and activated by problem awareness. The personal norm mediated the effects from general values, environmental values, and problem awareness on proenvironmental behavior.
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 6,
740-756 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/001391602237244

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. B. Truelove and J. Joireman
Understanding the Relationship Between Christian Orthodoxy and Environmentalism: The Mediating Role of Perceived Environmental Consequences
Environment and Behavior,
November 1, 2009;
41(6):
806 - 820.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K. Nisbet, J. M. Zelenski, and S. A. Murphy
The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals' Connection With Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior
Environment and Behavior,
September 1, 2009;
41(5):
715 - 740.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Howes and R. Gifford
Stable or Dynamic Value Importance?: The Interaction Between Value Endorsement Level and Situational Differences on Decision-Making in Environmental Issues
Environment and Behavior,
July 1, 2009;
41(4):
549 - 582.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I. M. de Groot and L. Steg
Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior: How to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic, and Biospheric Value Orientations
Environment and Behavior,
May 1, 2008;
40(3):
330 - 354.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I.M. De Groot and L. Steg
Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries: Validity of an Instrument to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic and Biospheric Value Orientations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
May 1, 2007;
38(3):
318 - 332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Schultz, V. V. Gouveia, L. D. Cameron, G. Tankha, P. Schmuck, and M. Franek
Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
July 1, 2005;
36(4):
457 - 475.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Corbett
Altruism, Self-Interest, and the Reasonable Person Model of Environmentally Responsible Behavior
Science Communication,
June 1, 2005;
26(4):
368 - 389.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|