This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Longmuir, P. E. Articles by Axelson, P. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Impact of Running Slope and Cross Slope on the Difficulty Level of Outdoor Pathways

A Comparison of Proposed Design Guidelines and User Perceptions

Michelle G. Freeland

Shirley G. Fitzgerald, Ph.D.

Denise A. Yamada

Peter W. Axelson

This pilot study examined proposed accessibility guidelines for running slope and cross slope and the perceived difficulty ratings of individuals with mobility limitations. Participants were 23 men and women, 23 to 67 years, with vision or mobility limitations who walked at their preferred pace before rating the path difficulty (1 to 10 scale). Paths meeting the proposed accessibility guidelines were rated as either easy or moderate for difficulty of use. Slopes exceeding the guidelines may also be acceptable for very short distances or on hard/paved surfaces. Future research should include a large representative population, evaluate surface firmness, and examine different perceptions between ambulatory individuals and wheelchair users.

Key Words: trails • disability • running slope • cross slope • level of difficulty

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 3, 376-399 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916503035003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?