Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Leverich, O. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Searching for Legibility

Thomas R. Herzog

Grand Valley State University in Allendale, Michigan.

Olivia L. Leverich

Indiana State University.

Legibility has been ineffective as a predictor of environmental preference primarily because of its correlation with another predictor, coherence. The authors tried to separate the two predictors by careful selection of field/forest settings and by using nontraditional definitions. The alternate definitions emphasized landmarks (for legibility) and the two-dimensional picture plane (for coherence). These strategies proved unsuccessful for the entire sample of settings. However, when an empirically derived subset of forest settings was examined, the desired pattern of relations among the traditionally defined constructs was found: Legibility had a slightly stronger correlation with preference than coherence, and legibility was clearly the stronger predictor in regression models that included several predictors. Post hoc analyses involving openness suggested visual access is a major component of legibility in forest settings. The authors now believe the forest setting category is a good domain for establishing the salience of legibility as an independent predictor of preference.

Key Words: legibility • coherence • preference • visual access • field/forest

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 4, 459-477 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916503035004001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
T. R. Herzog and A. E. Rector
Perceived Danger and Judged Likelihood of Restoration
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2009; 41(3): 387 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
T. R. Herzog and A. G. Bryce
Mystery and Preference in Within-Forest Settings
Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2007; 39(6): 779 - 796.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
K. Finlay, V. Kanetkar, J. Londerville, and H. H. C. Marmurek
The Physical and Psychological Measurement of Gambling Environments
Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2006; 38(4): 570 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
T. R. Herzog and K. M. Kirk
Pathway Curvature and Border Visibility as Predictors of Preference and Danger in Forest Settings
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2005; 37(5): 620 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
T. R. Herzog and L. S. Kropscott
Legibility, Mystery, and Visual Access as Predictors of Preference and Perceived Danger in Forest Settings without Pathways
Environment and Behavior, September 1, 2004; 36(5): 659 - 677.
[Abstract] [PDF]