This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, J. Articles by Kaplan, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Physical and Psychological Factors in Sense of Community

New Urbanist Kentlands and Nearby Orchard Village

Lawrence Technological University.

Rachel Kaplan

Sense of community is often mentioned as an asset of new urbanism. The purpose of the study was to explore this claim by comparing Kentlands, a prototypic new urbanist community, with a traditional suburban development near it. Four domains of sense of community were examined, each in terms of 17 distinct aspects of the physical environment, through surveys as well as interviews with residents. The findings suggest thatKentlands residents perceive substantially greater sense of community; they express stronger attachment to their community and sense of identity with it. Natural features and open spaces play a particularly important role in sense of community and Kentlands provides a rich variety of these, fostering pedestrianism and increasing the likelihood of social interactions. The overall layout of the community and traditional architectural style, as well as many other physical features, play vital functions in achieving sense of community

Key Words: sense of community • newurbanism • place attachment • community identity • pedestrianism

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Pendola and S. Gen Does "Main Street" Promote Sense of Community? A Comparison of San Francisco Neighborhoods Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2008; 40(4): 545 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Ganapati Critical Appraisal of Three Ideas for Community Development in the United States Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2008; 27(4): 382 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T Sugiyama, E Leslie, B Giles-Corti, and N Owen Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2008; 62(5): e9 - e9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. du Toit, E. Cerin, E. Leslie, and N. Owen Does Walking in the Neighbourhood Enhance Local Sociability? Urban Stud, August 1, 2007; 44(9): 1677 - 1695. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. R. Kearney Residential Development Patterns and Neighborhood Satisfaction: Impacts of Density and Nearby Nature Environment and Behavior, January 1, 2006; 38(1): 112 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Youngentob and M. Hostetler Is a New Urban Development Model Building Greener Communities? Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2005; 37(6): 731 - 759. [Abstract] [PDF]