Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cubukcu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Nasar, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relation of Physical Form to Spatial Knowledge in Largescale Virtual Environments

Ebru Cubukcu

Dokuz Eylul University in Izmir, Turkey

Jack L. Nasar

Ohio State University

This study used a desktop virtual environmental simulation of 18 large-scale residential environments to test effects of plan layout complexity, physical differentiation, and gender on acquired spatial knowledge. One hundred sixty people (95 males and 65 females) were assigned at random to the different conditions. After a learning phase, participants were asked to (a) estimate the direction from the start point to a destination, (b) navigate to the destination, and (c) select the layout of the environment and sketch the route they took. Higher scores for acquired spatial knowledge emerged for simple over complex environments, for moderate or high differentiation over no differentiation, and for landmark or road differentiation over no such differentiation. For direction and navigation errors males performed marginally better than females, and for navigation errors younger respondents performed better. The results suggest that designs with physical differentiation and fewer choices at nodes will help people learn their way around.

Key Words: spatial knowledge • wayfinding • navigation • gender • virtual environments

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 37, No. 3, 397-417 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916504269748


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?