This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Koneya, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Location and Interaction in Row-and-Column Seating Arrangements

Lila Acheson Wallace School of Community Service and Public Affairs, University of Oregon

The verbal behavior, physical locations, and seat preferences of members of large groups assembled in row-and-column seating arrangements were investigated. In several trials of the experiment subjects had been categorized a priori as "high," "moderate," or "low" in respect to verbalization rates and then were randomly assigned to seats without regard for these rates. Subsequent research procedures revealed that location significantly affected the verbalization rates of the "highs" and the "moderates." Centrally located seats were associated with significantly higher verbalization rates on the part of their occupants than were noncentrally located seats. These findings confirmed the observations of previous investigators that there is an "ecology of participation" in classrooms which may make it possible to predict from which locations most verbalizations would emanate.

Through the administration of a projective procedure it was also revealed that "high" verbalizers chose central seats to a greater degree and extent than did "low" verbalizers. The seat preferences of "high" and "moderate" verbalizers also differed significantly; "high" verbalizers preferred central seats to a greater extent than did "moderate" verbalizers. Some aspects of coping theory were offered as a possible explanation of this behavior.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 8, No. 2, 265-282 (1976)
DOI: 10.1177/001391657682005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Montello An Effect of Seating Location on Course Achievement?: Comment on Brooks and Rebeta Environment and Behavior, May 1, 1992; 24(3): 396 - 399.

				C. I. Brooks and J. L. Rebeta College Classroom Ecology: The Relation of Sex of Student to Classroom Performance and Seating Preference Environment and Behavior, May 1, 1991; 23(3): 305 - 313. [Abstract]

				P. M. Baker Seeing Is Behaving: Visibility and Participation in Small Groups Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1984; 16(2): 159 - 184. [Abstract]

				A. E. Woolfolk and D. M. Brooks Chapter 5: Nonverbal Communication in Teaching Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1983; 10(1): 103 - 149. [PDF]

				L. Stires Classroom Seating Location, Student Grades, and Attitudes: Environment or Self-Selection? Environment and Behavior, June 1, 1980; 12(2): 241 - 254. [Abstract]

				C. S. Weinstein The Physical Environment of the School: A Review of the Research Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1979; 49(4): 577 - 610. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. A. Smith Nonverbal Communication in Teaching Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1979; 49(4): 631 - 672. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Koneya Privacy Regulation in Small and Large Groups Group Organization Management, September 1, 1977; 2(3): 324 - 335. [Abstract]