Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuelson, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lindauer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Perception, Evaluation, and Performance in a Neat and Messy Room by High and Low Sensation Seekers

David J. Samuelson

Family Resources Inc., in Middleboro, Massuchusetts

Martin S. Lindauer

State University of New York, College at Brockport

Two studies investigated the effects of room environment. In Study 1, 42 men and women undergraduates, divided into high and low scorers on the Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale, described and evaluated a neat or messy room on the basis of, in part, the Kasmar Environmental Description Scales. In Study 11, 56 high and low scoring sensation seekers performed three tasks in a neat or messy room. Low scorers evaluated the neat room more positively than high scorers, while high scorers rated the messy room more positively than low scorers. The rooms were described differently, in part, as a function of personality. Except for the rating of a representational painting, the evaluation of an abstract painting, the solution rate for anagrams, and elapsed time estimation did not vary as a function of room condition and personality. Sex differences vere also not found to be critical.

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 8, No. 2, 291-306 (1976)
DOI: 10.1177/001391657682007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
K. H. Craik and G. E. McKechnie
Editor's Introduction: Personality and the Environment
Environment and Behavior, June 1, 1977; 9(2): 155 - 168.