|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 6,
745-767 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916505285933
A Cross-Cultural Study of Environmental Motive Concerns and Their Implications for Proenvironmental Behavior
Taciano L. Milfont
Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil, University of Auckland, New Zealand, t.milfont{at}auckland.ac.nz
John Duckitt
University of Auckland
Linda D. Cameron
University of Auckland
Environmental concern can be driven by biospheric, egoistic or altruistic motives. Few studies, however, have compared these three environmental motive concerns across cultural groups. This study investigated differences between European New Zealanders and Asian New Zealanders in environmental motive concerns and their implications for proenvironmental behaviors. The results demonstrated that the tripartite model of environmental concerns provided good fit in both samples. They also indicated that Asian New Zealanders were significantly higher than European New Zealanders on egoistic concern, whereas European New Zealanders were significantly higher on biospheric concern. For European New Zealanders, biospheric concern predicted proenvironmental behavior positively, whereas egoistic concern predicted it negatively. For Asian New Zealanders, in contrast, both biospheric and altruistic concerns predicted proenvironmental behavior positively. The implications of these findings for environmental education campaigns are discussed.
Key Words: environmental concern • environmental motives scale • ethnocultural differences
References
- Aoyagi-Usui, M., Vinken, H., & Kuribayashi, A. (2003).Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: An international comparison. Human Ecology Review, 10, 23-31.
- Bator, R. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). The application of persuasion theory to the development of effective proenvironmental public service announcements. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 527-541.[CrossRef]
- Bechtel, R. B., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 122-128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. D. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohinstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27.[Abstract]
- Choo, P. S., & Williams, M. J. (2003). Fisheries production in Asian: Its role in food security and nutrition. NAGA, WorldFish Center Quarterly, 26, 11-16.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Corral-Verdugo, V., & Armendáriz, L. I. (2000). The "new environmental paradigm" in a Mexican community. Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 25-31.
- Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K., D. (1978).The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.[ISI]
- Finney, S. J., & Davis, S. L. (2003, April). Examining the invariance of the achievement goal questionnaire across gender. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
- Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382.[CrossRef]
- Gouveia, V. V. (2002).Self, culture, and sustainable development. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 151-174). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M.-K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636-654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
- Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M., & Cordell, H. K. (2004). Ethnic variation in environmental belief and behavior: An examination in a social psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 36, 157-186.[Abstract]
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
- Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.[Abstract]
- Leung, C., & Rice, J. (2002). Comparison of Chinese-Australian and Anglo-Australian environmental attitudes and behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 251-262.[CrossRef]
- Maloney, M. P., & Ward, M. P. (1973). Ecology: Let’s hear it from the people—An objective scale for measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28, 583-586.[CrossRef]
- McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543-554.[CrossRef]
- Milfont, T. L., Bizumic, B., & Duckitt, J. (2004). Concern for environmental issues: A comparison between Pakeha and Asians. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 82-82.
- Milfont, T. L., Coelho Júnior, L. L., Gouveia, V. V., & Coelho, J. A. P. M. (2003, August). Human values: Their correlation with environmental attitudes and behaviors. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Meeting of the Division of Environmental Psychology of the German Psychological Association, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
- Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2004).The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second- order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 289-303.[CrossRef]
- Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help? American Psychologist, 55, 496-508.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
- Schmuck, P. (2003, August). Biospheric, altruistic, egoistic environmental concern and environmental behavior. Paper presented at the 5th Biannual Meeting of the Division of Environmental Psychology of the German Psychological Association, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
- Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.[CrossRef]
- Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327-339.[CrossRef]
- Schultz, P. W. (2002). Environmental attitudes and behaviors across cultures. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, & D .N. Sattler (Eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 8, Chapter 4). Retrieved May 17, 2005, from http://www.ac.wwu.edu/%7Eculture/Schultz.htm
- Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457-475.[Abstract]
- Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31-42.[CrossRef]
- Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558.[Abstract]
- Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.[CrossRef]
- Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L. C., & Dalrymple, N. J. (2000).A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32, 576-591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). New York: Academic.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1999). Cultural value differences: Some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23-48.[CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M. (1995). Values in the West: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 91-122.
- Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Social psychology across cultures. London:PrenticeHall.
- Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., Schwartz, S. H., Ahmad, A. H., Akande, D., Andersen, J. A., et al. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance and their relevance to managerial behaviors: A 47 nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 188-208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Star, P. (2003). New Zealand environmental history: A question of attitudes. Environment and History, 9, 463-475.
- Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
- Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995).The new ecological paradigmin social-psycho-logical context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.[Abstract]
- Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261-284). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980).Thesocial bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.[Abstract]
- Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981).Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environment and Behavior, 13, 651-676.[Abstract]
- Weigel, R., & Weigel, J. (1978). Environmental concern: The development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10, 3-15.[Abstract]
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
