This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wall, R. Articles by Mill, G. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparing and Combining Theories to Explain Proenvironmental Intentions

The Case of Commuting-Mode Choice

De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

Patrick Devine-Wright

University of Manchester, UK

Greig A. Mill

De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

This article addresses the need for systematic theory comparison and development in environmentally significant behavior (ESB) research. Using logistic regression (N = 398), models based on Schwartz's norm-activation theory (NAT) and Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB) were compared as explanations of drivers' intentions to reduce or maintain their car use for commuting. NAT explained more variance (McFadden R² = .342). A model using NAT and TPB constructs was also tested. This explained more variance than either individual theory (McFadden R² = .379). A personal-normative variable (NAT) and perceived behavioral control (TPB) were the only statistically-significant predictors of intentions in the model derived from both theories. It is argued that combining NAT and TPB constructs accounts for a range of influences on car-use intentions that neither individual theory fully captures. A combined model may also apply to other ESBs, especially those perceived as reducing personal utility (i.e., entailing sacrifice).

Key Words: travel • commuting • norm-activation theory • theory of planned behavior

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-221.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Anable, J., & Gatersleben, B. (2005). All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A, 39(2/3), 163-181.
• Armitage, C., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264-285.[Abstract]
• Bristow, A., Pridmore, A., Tight, M., May, T., Berkhout, F., & Harris, M. (2004). How can we reduce carbon emissions from transport? Tyndall Centre Technical Report, 15. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from www.tyndall.ac.uk/research/theme2/final_reports/it1_7.pdf
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Hove, UK: Routledge.
• Collins, C., & Chambers, S. (2005). Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice. Environment and Behavior, 37(5), 640-661.[Abstract]
• De Montfort University. (2005). Travel plan progress report: Leicester City Campus. Retrieved July 27 2006, from www.dmu.ac.uk/aboutdmu/services/estates/transport/TP_Index.jsp
• Department for Transport. (2004). The future of transport: A network for 2030 (UK Government transport White Paper). Retrieved June 2, 2005, from www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_about/documents/page/dft_about_031286.pdf
• Enders, W. (2004). Applied econometric time series. New York: John Wiley.
• Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics: Using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage.
• Gärling, T., Gärling, A., & Johansson, A. (2000). Household choices of car-use reduction measures. Transportation Research Part A, 34, 309-320.
• Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505-2528.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Höger, R. (2001). Responsibility and environment: Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(6), 830-852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
• Klöckner, C., & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 319-327.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Matthies, E. (2003). One to bind them all: How the modified moral decision making model can be used for the integration of measures to promote pro-environmental travel mode choices. In T. Craig (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the EPUK Network (pp. 103-109). Aberdeen, Scotland: Robert Gordon University.
• Matthies, E., Kuhn, S., & Klöckner, C. (2002). Travel mode choice of women: The result of limitation, ecological norm, or weak habit? Environment and Behavior, 34(2), 163-177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Nankervis, M. (1999). The effect of weather and climate on bicycle commuting. Transportation Research Part A, 33, 417-431.[CrossRef]
• Oom Do Valle, P., Rebelo, E., Reis, E., & Menezes, J. (2005). Combining behavioral theories to predict recycling involvement. Environment and Behavior, 37(3), 364-396.[Abstract]
• Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T., & Feinstein, A. (1996). A simulation of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 99, 1373-1379.
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 222-279). New York: Academic Press.
• Steg, L. (2003). Can public transport compete with the private car? IATSS Research, 27(2), 27-35.
• Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A, 39(2-3), 147-162.
• Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2003, May). Sustainable transportation and quality of life, Sustainable Transport in Europe and Links and Liaisons with America (STELLA) project focus group. Retrieved December 3, 2003, from www.feweb.vu.nl/re/STELLA/FocusGroup4/Quebec/papers/Steg-gifford.doc
• Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (1997). The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures. In T. Rothengatter & E. Carbonell Vaya (Eds.), Traffic and transport psychology (pp. 465-475). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
• Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Slotegraaf, G. (2001). Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research Part F, 4, 151-169.[CrossRef]
• Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally-significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Stern, P., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97.
• Tertoolen, G., Van Kreveld, D., & Verstraten, B. (1998). Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use. Transportation Research Part A, 32(3), 171-181.
• Triandis, H. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Ziman, J. (1991). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

This version was published on November 1, 2007

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 6, 731-753 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916506294594


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wall, R. Articles by Mill, G. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?