Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peponis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zimring, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Designing Space to Support Knowledge Work

John Peponis

Georgia Institute of Technology

Sonit Bafna

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ritu Bajaj

Steelcase, Inc.

Joyce Bromberg

Steelcase, Inc.

Christine Congdon

Steelcase, Inc.

Mahbub Rashid

University of Kansas

Susan Warmels

Steelcase, Inc.

Yan Zhang

Georgia Institute of Technology

Craig Zimring

Georgia Institute of Technology

Based on spatial analysis, network analysis, self-assessment questionnaires, field discussions and accounting documents, the authors discuss how workplace design and spatial layout support productivity in a communication design organization. The authors suggest that the impact of design goes beyond supporting more intense patterns of interaction and smoother flows of information. Workplace design and layout provide an intelligible framework within which collective knowledge is continuously explored, represented, interpreted, and transformed in relation to ongoing projects. Thus, the structure of space supports an organizational culture with cognitive functions.

Key Words: office design • network analysis • space syntax • productivity • community-based planning

References

  • Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17-25.[Abstract]
  • Brill, M., Margulis, S., Konar, E., & Bosti (1984). Using office design to increase productivity. Buffalo, NY: Workplace Design and Productivity.
  • Brill, M., Weidemann, S., Alard, L., Olson, J., & Keable, E. (2001) Disproving widespread myths about workplace design. Jasper, IN: Kimball International.
  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
  • Cross, R., Borgatti, S.P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-46.[Web of Science]
  • Duffy, F. (1974). Office design and organizations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1, 11-118, 217-236.[CrossRef]
  • Duffy, F. (1992). The changing workplace. London: Phaidon Press.
  • Duffy, F., Cave, C., & Worthington, J. (1976). Planning office space. London: The Architectural Press.
  • Etzioni, A., (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 5(3), 215-239.
  • Gouldner, A.W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.
  • Grajewski, T. (1993). The SAS head office — spatial configuration and interaction patterns. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 2, 63-74.
  • Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Peponis, J. (1984) What do we mean by building function? In J. A. Powell, I. Cooper, & S. Lera (Eds.), Design for building utilization (pp. 61-72). London: Spon.
  • Hillier, B., Penn, A. (1991). Visible colleges: Structure and randomness in the place of discovery. Science in Context, 1(4), 23-49.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Neimenen, J. (1974). On centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 322-336.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Penn, A., Desyllas, J., Vaughan, L. (1999). The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), 193-218.[CrossRef]
  • Peponis, J. (1985). The spatial culture of factories. Human Relations, 38, 357-390.[Abstract]
  • Peponis, J., & Stansall, P. (1987). Spatial culture. Designers's Jnl, 27, 52-56.
  • Peponis, J., & Wineman, J. (2002). The spatial structure of environment and behavior. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman(Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 271-291). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Bafna, S., Rashid, M., & Kim, S.H. (1998). On the generation of linear representations of spatial configuration. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 559-576.[CrossRef]
  • Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analysis. London: Tavistock.
  • Peters, T.J. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Warner Books.
  • Pile, J. (1978). Open office planning. London: Architectural Press.
  • Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E.W. (2001). Networks, diversity and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organizational Science, 12(4), 502-517.[CrossRef]
  • Roethlisberger, J., & Dickson, W.J. (1939). Management and the worker. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • Rubinstein, S. (2000). The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of the Saturn organization. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53(2), 197- 218.
  • Rulke, D.L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure and group performance. Management Science, 46(5), 612-625.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Serrato, M., & Wineman, J. (1999) Spatial and communication patterns in R&D facilities. In. L. Amorim & F. Dufaux (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Space Syntax Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 11.1-11.8). Distrito Federal, Brazil: Fundação de Apoio á Pesquisa do Distrito Federal.
  • Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Kraimer, M.L. (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Tichy, N., Tushman, M.L., & Fombrun, C. (1979) Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review 1979, 4(4), 507-519.[CrossRef]
  • Trist, E.L., Higgin, G.W., Murray, H., & Pollock, A.B. (1963). Organizational choice. London: Tavistock.
  • Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001) From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning (B): Planning and Design, 28, 103-121.[CrossRef]
  • Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 425-444.[CrossRef]
  • Van den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R.K. (1998). The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing and manufacturing. Management Science, 44(11), S1-S18.
  • Wineman, J.D. (1986). The importance of office design to organizational effectiveness and productivity. In J. D. Wineman (Ed.), Behavioral issues in office design (pp. ix-xvii). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Wineman, J.D., & Serrato, M. (1998). Facility design for high-performance teams. In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting Work Team Effectiveness (271-298). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

This version was published on November 1, 2007

Environment and Behavior, Vol. 39, No. 6, 815-840 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0013916506297216


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
J. D. Wineman, F. W. Kabo, and G. F. Davis
Spatial and Social Networks in Organizational Innovation
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2009; 41(3): 427 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peponis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Zimring, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?